John Adams used the words “government of laws, and not of men” when he wrote the Bill of Rights for the Massachusetts Constitution in 1780. The preamble to the Massachusetts Constitution includes: “We, therefore, the people of Massachusetts, acknowledging, with grateful hearts, the goodness of the great Legislator of the universe, in affording us, in the course of His providence, an opportunity, deliberately and peaceably, without fraud, violence or surprise, of entering into an original, explicit, and solemn compact with each other; and of forming a new constitution of civil government, for ourselves and posterity; and devoutly imploring His direction in so interesting a design, do agree upon, ordain and establish the following Declaration of Rights, and Frame of Government, as the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.” The Massachusetts Bill of Rights goes on to read like the principles in the non-sectarian Creator-based Declaration of Independence.
In contrast, a government “of men” rests upon revisionist morality, which makes the Constitution meaningless. Contemporary liberals who reject the God-honoring meaning for “government of laws, and not of men” are aided by militant atheists, who not only reject “government of law,” but work feverishly to eliminate all references to God in education and public discourse. Described by Solon of Athens as “government by incalculable and changeable decrees,” the religious justification for revisionist morality is a strongly held belief about life’s origin, meaning and purpose: atheistic Darwinism.* Sold as absolute science, the demand for education exclusivity is, in reality, the religion of scientific fascism. Liberals are constantly revising Darwin’s theory because the absurdity of their science is continually being exposed. The underlying cause of the anger and militancy for their demands becomes clear. They must prevent any ideological competition in the taxpayer-funded classroom. Secular militants must have total control in order to dumb the students down.
Elected representatives make laws and serve by the “consent of the governed,” who are “endowed by their Creator” with certain unalienable rights. This claim reaches the very heart of American society and law. Conservative Supreme Court justices have cited the Declaration as support for their decisions over two hundred times. The Federalist Papers, written to promote acceptance of the Constitution by the people, cited the Declaration thirty-seven times.
When the Founding Fathers undertook a long war for independence, the did not dither, knowing full well that there were huge problems such as slavery and harmful citizen voting restrictions. Citizen awareness, prayer and the Declaration of Independence resonates with people and by the grace of God those problems in 1776 were remedied. With citizen awareness, which we are working on, and prayer, the cancer of socialistic paternalism can be removed.
*Will and Ariel Durant, The Story of Civilization, Vol. II, The Life of Greece, Simon and Schuster, 1939, 118.
~ David Norris